Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Chisholm's avatar

Great post and insights for #Oldlaw firms (i.e those firms that still leverage people x time x hourly rate-which are still most firms) Jordan. Language and incentives matter-as of course does the business model.

Luckily the firms I work with and respect don't have billable or non billable hours anymore. They don't even have "fee earners" and "non fee earners". They price all their work up front.

If you measure and reward time-which #Oldlaw/Biglaw still do, that is what you will get - and you will get it in spadefuls ( which is admittedly going to get harder with the advent of GenA! etc as you point out).

As Matthew Burgess, ex BigLaw partner and now owner of one of Australia's pre-eminent specialist estate planning firms ViewLegal (which has never billed by time and has never kept time sheets) says,

“With timesheets you think what is billable. Without timesheets you think what is valuable”.

Everything we do as you point out is an investment in the future. Like all investments sometimes they are good-sometimes not so good. Sometimes valuable sometimes not so valuable.

Anecdotally Jordan I have found over last 15 years those firms that have moved away from the "we sell time" #Oldlaw business model tend to make better investments decisions-both for themselves and their clients.

Expand full comment
Damien Riehl's avatar

Your posts are always insightful — this post is particularly brilliant.

Language reflects values. Let's value *all* business aspects that increase revenue (both today and tomorrow).

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts